top of page
  • Writer's pictureQPRC


Before the Court is Plaintiff Mariner IC Inc.’s and Defendant ASUSTek Computer Inc.’s Joint 4-3 Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement regarding the asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,650,666 and 5,846,874. ASUSTek represents that “it does not contest any of Mariner’s proposed constructions” and “does not independently advance the constructions proposed by TiVo (proposed constructions in which ASUSTek previously joined, but from which it now withdraws).” With that in mind, “Mariner accepts ASUSTek’s offer to vacate the remaining claim construction proceedings and to request entry of an order adopting Mariner’s proposed claim constructions.” Relying upon the Parties’ representation that “there are no longer any contested terms” and that the Parties “do not anticipate needing a Claim Construction Hearing”, the Court hereby ORDERS AND ADOPTS the constructions set forth herein. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the Claim Construction Hearing previously scheduled for June 20, 2019.

26 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

CXT Systems, Inc. v Academy, Ltd. (LEAD CASE)

Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order Determinations US7016875 - Not Invalid US7257581 - Not Invalid US8260806 - Not Invalid Related Cases CXT v Pier 1 Imports, Inc. Case TXED-2-18-cv-00172


bottom of page