Activity in Case . Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Taasera Licensing LLC et al Order

Denied - Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings of

Patent-Ineligibility under 35 USC 101

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER; Motions terminated: (109 in 2:22-cv-00314-JRG) MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings of Patent-Ineligibility under 35 USC 101 filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc.,

(71 in 2:22-md-03042-JRG) MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings of Patent-Ineligibility Under 35 USC 101 filed by Palo Alto Networks Inc, (87 in 2:22-cv-00314-JRG) SEALED MOTION filed by Taasera Licensing LLC, (11 in 2:22-md-03042-JRG) SEALED MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Taasera Licensing LLC.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 03/15/2023. (klc, )

Case Name:

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Taasera Licensing LLC et al

Case Number:

2:22-cv-00314-JRG

Filer:

Document Number:

147

Docket Text: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER; Motions terminated: (109 in 2:22-cv-00314-JRG) MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings of Patent-Ineligibility under 35 USC 101 filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc., (71 in 2:22-md-03042-JRG) MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings of Patent-Ineligibility Under 35 USC 101 filed by Palo Alto Networks Inc, (87 in 2:22-cv-00314-JRG) SEALED MOTION filed by Taasera Licensing LLC, (11 in 2:22-md-03042-JRG) SEALED MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Taasera Licensing LLC.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 03/15/2023. (klc, )

Activity in Case - In re: Taasera Licensing LLC, Patent Litigation

Denied - Motion to Dismiss

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Taasera Licensing LLC’s Amended Complaint

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (the “Motion”) (2:21-cv-00441-JRG, Dkt. No. 39) filed by

Defendant Trend Micro Incorporated (“Trend Micro Japan”). On February 21, 2023, the Court held a hearing regarding the Motion. (Dkt. No. 79). Having considered the Motion, the subsequent briefing, the oral arguments, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED.

QPRC Portfolio Update - Tyche Licensing LLC v Infineon Technologies, AG

On May 13, 2022, QPRC affiliate Tyche Licensing LLC filed a Complaint for Patent Infringement against Infineon Technologies, AG.

The Complaint was filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and the Case Number is 2:22-cv-00147.

You can access a copy of the Complaint at the link below.

Link to Complaint.

Acquired as part of the Company's portfolio purchase from Intellectual Ventures Assets 181 LLC and Intellectual Ventures Assets 174 LLC in January 2022, the Tyche Licensing LLC patent portfolio relates generally to symmetric inducting devices incorporated in integrated circuits and in particular to an integrated circuit having symmetric inducting device with a ground shield.

Find out more on the Tyche Licensing LLC page.